| The House Emergency Supplemental: Micro-managing The War |
| Written by N.Z. | |
| Wednesday, 14 March 2007 | |
|
The Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives has decided to micro-manage the war effort by loading the funding bill required to authorize continued operations in Iraq with conditions and provisions designed to force the President to retreat and withdraw from the fight.
The Victory Caucus is pleased to be the very first online --- or print --- media outlet to present in full the text of the conditions imposed in the bill. Click through to see for yourself how the Democratic leadership wants to hamstring the war effort.
The full 170+ pages of the bill can be found in scanned PDF form here. Warning: this is a 6MB file!
Update: You can now browse through the bill, page-by-page, starting right here . Also included are bookmarks to key absurdities within the bill, such as the $120M for shrimp research , the $25M for spinach , and the most important measure to help our troops achieve victory in Iraq --- an increase in the minimum wage .
The text below begins on Page 69 per the PDF file's page numbering.
Other blogs are also zeroing in on the moral bankrupcy of this approach. Dean Barnett sums up the constitutional issue :
Smash, blogging at Michelle Malkin's place, points out an important reason why the Democratic restrictions on 'troop readiness' are an impossible impediment to military operations :
Ed Morrisey's summation of the bill is brief and to the point : "This bill is a joke, and the authors are the worst comedians on the circuit."
We'll keep updating this post with additional blog commentary as it comes in. But now, on to the text in question...
GENERAL PROVISIONS - THIS TITLE Comments (5)
![]() written by SD, March 15, 2007 written by Richard Cook, March 16, 2007
So, all the Prez has to do is certify
whether the Government of Iraq has given United States Armed Forces and Iraqi Security Forces the authority to pursue all extremists, including Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias, and is making substantial progress in delivering necessary Iraqi Security Forces for Baghdad and protecting such Forces from political interference; intensifying efforts to build balanced security forces throughout Iraq that provide even-handed security for all Iraqis; ensuring that Iraq's political authorities are not undermining or making false accusations against members of the Iraqi Security Forces; eliminating militia control of local security; establishing a strong militia disarmament program; ensuring fair and just enforcement of laws; establishing political, media, economic, and service committees in support of the Baghdad Security Plan, and eradicating safe havens;...is making substantial progress in meeting its commitment to pursue reconciliation initiatives, including enactment of a hydro-carbon law; adoption of legislation necessary for the conduct of provincial and local elections; reform of current laws governing the de-Baathification process; amendment of the Constitution of Iraq; and allocation of Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects; and...whether the Government of Iraq and United States Armed Forces and making substantial progress in reducing the level of sectarian violence in Iraq[;]...has enacted a broadly accepted hydro-carbon law that equitably shares oil revenues among all Iraqis; adopted legislation necessary for the conduct of provincial and local elections, taken steps to implement such legislation, and set a schedule to conduct provincial and local elections; reformed current laws governing the de-Baathification process to allow for more equitable treatment of individuals affected by such laws; amended the Constitution of Iraq consistent with the principles contained in article 137 of such constitution; and allocated and begun expenditure of $10 billion in Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects, including delivery of essential services, on an equitable basis[.] That's all? [I'd like to see Ms. Pelosi "certify" some of those things about our own country.] And how much of this laundry list must the Iraqis meet in order to earn our assistance? If in the transmissions to Congress required by subsection (a) the President determines that any of the conditions specified in each subsection have not been met, or if the President is unable to make the certification specified in subsection (b) by the required date, the Secretary of Defense shall commence the redeployment of the Armed Forces from Iraq and complete such redeployment within 180 days. It's increasingly clear that Victory Republicans will only be able to stand down after we've gotten the Democrats to stand up. written by Rarivette, March 16, 2007
Equitable treatment of Baathists? You mean the armed gang of thugs from the city of Tikrit who were all Saddam's relatives, who removed their last names be decree to hide their association, controlled the whole country like their private rape pleasure palace, patterned their lives and armed forces after Hitler? Those Baathists? Or do you mean the nice liberal Baathists who would never harm a fly? You people writing these bills up there in Washington (spinning in his grave) D.C. really need to clarify, before you certify...
Hello. Ms. Pelosi. Do you understand the word "equity". It means equal. Nothing in chaos is equal. I’m sorry but perhaps no one told you this is not a sorority event where Buffy and Missy are struggling over what goes in the punchbowl. I know you are into fabulous decorations but this is a little more unpredictable than fixing the time when you are going to hold the first ladies’ choice of the evening… All people, institutions and events must be viewed, interpreted and reacted to INDIVIDUALLY requiring individual solutions while still managing to operate in the space-time continuum. In other words... this ridiculous requirement set is a self-fulfilling prophecy. No one can ever prove or disprove most of what is stated there. How you could even define militia control of an area and differentiate it characteristically from say, a local criminal gang, a network of gang activity, kind of like MS-13 in this country. You know? All those illegal aliens who just want to work who commit the highest percent of violent crime in this nation. Maybe Iraq should demand we alter our Constitution so we treat them equitably as we attempt to de-MS-13-gangify the USA. I do love the idea of eliminating safe havens... Can Ms. Pelosi or anyone tell me when we will have achieved that goal? I mean. Isn't the idea of a safe haven a place where terrorists and foreign insurgents can gather unknown to the Iraqi government and the US forces? Otherwise, if we all knew about them and when they had or had not been eliminated, they wouldn't really be safe would they? This bill sounds like a George Carlin routine. On the airline the flight attendant announces: "Please look around your immediate seating area for anything you might have brought on board." To which Carlin replies: "My immediate seating area? What other kind of seating area is there? For items I MIGHT have brought on board. I might have brought on my kitchen sink. But I didn't! SO I'M NOT GOING TO LOOK FOR IT!" I think we should let Congress dictate where and when the troops go or do anything for a month or so. When they end up taking control and getting most of our soldiers killed, or lost like airline luggage, then they will understand that micro-managing foreign policy is not so easy. It seems like the House of Representative's glorious leader is more like a high school theatre director who wants everyone to line up in straight rows on two diagonals, but they never seem to get it right, so she has to scrap the whole musical number...? But that upset the mother of the one girl in the chorus who only had a solo in that song, so the mother went to the school board. And now they are telling the high school musical director that they have to put the musical piece back in but they can do it at the end and take a poll after the show is over to see how many people attending want to stay to see the extra bit. Nancy, Nancy, Nancy. You are not only a flake. You are a world class airhead. You are rich. That is true. But is just goes to prove even poor people can be smart and rich people can be stupid. And you my dear are the latter. I'd rather be poor. Let me know when you reached that little equitable line on the balance you use to measure which people got what handout you are concerned about - so we will know when to applaud and you can take your bow. written by jamal, April 28, 2007
the fact remains that leaving troops in Iraq will not stabilise the region and removing the troops will not automatically enable Iraqis to overcome their political differences. However, US troops should pull-out as there were no WMD’s, the war constitutes an attack, and the cost of human life is immense and will continue to increase on all sides without a withdrawal.
written by jamal, April 28, 2007
..and lets us hope the withdrawel is soon!
http://radicalmuslim.blogsome.com/ Write comment
|
GREAT work Victory Caucus!!!!!